KLEIN: Politicians failing to properly inform on ‘15-minute city’ concept

Article content

The concept of the 15-minute city has generated intense debate in Winnipeg and now in Brandon. This urban planning model has attracted both supporters and opponents, leading to increasingly polarized discussions.

Article content

The core of this issue appears to stem from two main factors: the actions of politicians and the quality of communication. Public trust in elected officials has been declining for some time, and this lack of trust is apparent in recent public controversies. The debates surrounding the Sio Silica project and the backlash against Plan 2050 from local residents show a growing skepticism toward those in power. When residents lack confidence in decision-makers, even a well-intentioned proposal like the 15-minute city becomes a focal point for frustration and discontent.

The 15-minute city is a straightforward concept. It proposes that all essential services, such as grocery stores, schools, parks, and health-care facilities, be located within a 15-minute walk or bike ride from a person’s home. The goal is to reduce dependence on cars, promote healthier lifestyles, and create more connected neighbourhoods. At its core, the 15-minute city aims to design urban environments where residents can access most of their daily needs close to home. This could reduce traffic congestion, lower pollution levels, and encourage more physical activity. While the idea is appealing to some, it has also raised concerns and sparked debates among residents and experts.

Article content

Proponents of the 15-minute city argue that it offers several clear benefits. One of the main advantages is the potential to reduce traffic congestion. By cutting down the need for long car commutes, the model could lead to fewer road accidents and lower greenhouse gas emissions. A reduction in emissions would likely improve air quality, which could have positive effects on public health.

Advocates also point out that the model promotes walking and cycling, which are environmentally friendly modes of transport that also benefit physical health. Increased physical activity can help reduce obesity rates, lower the occurrence of heart disease, and improve overall health outcomes.

The local economy might benefit as well. When residents are more likely to shop and use services in their neighbourhoods, small businesses could see an increase in activity, contributing to a stronger local economy.

Article content

Article content

A focus on localized living can promote social interaction and community engagement, potentially strengthening neighbourhood bonds and fostering a greater sense of community.

However, the 15-minute city model is not without its drawbacks. One of the main challenges is the cost of developing the required infrastructure. To implement this model, cities would need to invest in creating pedestrian-friendly streets, expanding bike lanes, and ensuring that essential services are available in every neighbourhood.

These changes can be both expensive and time-consuming for city planners. There are also concerns about equity. Not all neighbourhoods are starting from the same point, and some could receive more resources and development than others. This could lead to disparities in access to services and amenities, which could worsen existing inequalities within a city.

Article content

Resistance from residents is another potential issue. Some people may prefer current urban layouts or rely heavily on car transportation, making them less likely to support changes that could affect their daily routines. In densely populated areas, finding space for new services, green spaces, or bike lanes can be difficult. Repurposing land to accommodate these changes might require creative solutions, some of which may be unpopular.

There is also the risk of gentrification. As neighbourhoods become more desirable due to improved amenities, property values and rents could increase. This could lead to the displacement of lower-income residents, counteracting the intended benefits of creating more livable and inclusive urban environments. This concern complicates the debate further, as any potential benefits must be weighed against the risk of increasing inequality and reducing diversity within urban communities.

Article content

The debate over the 15-minute city model highlights a broader issue that extends beyond urban planning. The success of such a model does not depend solely on careful planning, substantial investment, or a commitment to ensuring equitable access to services for all residents.

It also relies on politicians working to regain the trust of the people they represent. Distrust in elected officials is at the centre of the problem. Many residents feel that politicians often push popular concepts or buzzwords without fully understanding or considering the local context. The 15-minute city has become another example of this trend. Politicians who advocate for the 15-minute city because it is currently fashionable or because it aligns with certain advocacy groups without fully engaging with the community are not addressing the real issues.

Article content

There is also a significant communication gap that needs to be filled. For a policy like the 15-minute city to succeed, politicians need to engage with residents honestly and openly. It is not enough to attend events or give speeches without addressing the real concerns of the community.

Effective communication involves more than just promoting the benefits of a policy; it requires listening to residents, discussing potential downsides, considering alternative viewpoints, and being transparent about the challenges involved.

Residents need all the information to make informed decisions for themselves. This means going beyond superficial talking points and providing detailed, evidence-based explanations of what a 15-minute city would mean for their daily lives.

Article content

Until residents trust the decision-makers and feel fully informed about the potential benefits and challenges, the debate over the 15-minute city will remain divisive. The concept itself is neither inherently good nor bad; its impact depends on how it is implemented, communicated, and managed. Trust and communication are crucial components of any successful public policy, and without them, even the most well-meaning initiatives are likely to face resistance.

The discussions in Winnipeg and Brandon provide a clear example of the need for more transparency, engagement, and genuine dialogue between politicians and the communities they serve. The 15-minute city could be an opportunity for positive change, but only if it is built on a foundation of trust and clear communication.

— Kevin Klein is a former Tory cabinet minister, a former city councillor and is the President & CEO of Klein Group Ltd.

Have thoughts on what’s going on in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada or across the world? Send us a letter to the editor at wpgsun.letters@kleinmedia.ca

Article content